Skip to content Skip to footer

Jacob Buller: The Serial TCPA Litigator Who Took on Bernie Sanders, Then Got Arrested

Jacob Buller: The Serial TCPA Litigator Who Took on Bernie Sanders, Then Got Arrested

Jacob Buller, a 34-year-old Minnesota resident and professional UX designer, became a documented serial TCPA litigator when he and co-plaintiff Cody Olson sued the Bernie 2020 presidential campaign over unsolicited automated text messages.

Filed in June 2020 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, the putative class action alleged that the Sanders campaign used an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) to send political texts without prior express consent in violation of the TCPA.

Buller is not a casual consumer who received one unwanted text. He is not an occasional filer. He is a serial litigator whose litigation activity focuses heavily on political campaigns, automated marketing operations, and organizations using mass-texting technology.

Legal commentators, defense firms, and federal courts have all taken note of Buller’s litigation activity. His lawsuit against Bernie 2020 helped establish that political campaigns cannot automatically avoid TCPA liability merely by labeling text programs as “volunteer-driven” systems.

However, Buller’s background became significantly more controversial in late 2025. In November 2025, he was arrested in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario and charged with impaired operation, dangerous operation, and possession of fentanyl. Defense firms now use those criminal allegations to challenge his adequacy and credibility as a class representative in consumer litigation.

The public record presents a complex profile: a highly active TCPA plaintiff with technical expertise in automated systems whose recent criminal charges have substantially altered how defendants portray him in litigation.

IMPORTANT DISTINCTION: Jacob Buller’s Multiple Public Profiles

Jacob Buller presents an unusual combination of professional, litigation, and criminal-history narratives.

Identity Details Relevance
TCPA Litigator Named plaintiff in Buller v. Bernie 2020 Inc. THIS PROFILE
UX Designer / Product Strategist Lead UX Designer at Fjord and Chapter SF Technical knowledge of messaging systems
Criminal Defendant (2025) Arrested in Ontario for impaired operation and fentanyl possession Used by defense firms to challenge credibility

This profile focuses primarily on Jacob Buller’s TCPA litigation activities while acknowledging that his recent criminal charges are now part of the public record and frequently referenced in litigation commentary.

Who Is Jacob Buller? A UX Designer Turned Serial TCPA Litigator

Jacob Buller is a Minnesota-based TCPA plaintiff who became publicly known after suing the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign over political text messaging practices.

Court filings and legal commentary identify Buller as an active plaintiff involved in litigation concerning:

  • Automated text messaging
  • Political campaign communications
  • ATDS allegations
  • Peer-to-peer (P2P) texting systems
  • Recycled-number liability
  • Mass-texting compliance

Professional Profile

Field Details
Full Name Jacob Buller
Age 34 (as of 2025 arrest)
Location Dakota County, Minnesota
Occupation Lead UX Designer / Product Strategist
Employers Fjord, Chapter SF
Clients Facebook, Google, UberEats, USPTO
Litigation Role Serial TCPA Plaintiff

Documented Litigation Focus

  • Political campaign texting
  • Automated messaging platforms
  • ATDS claims
  • Peer-to-peer texting systems
  • Reassigned-number liability
  • “Staccato” text cadence allegations
  • Class action litigation

The UX-design connection is significant. Buller’s technical background allegedly allows him to analyze how automated marketing systems operate and where TCPA vulnerabilities may exist.

The Landmark Case: Buller v. Bernie 2020 Inc.

Jacob Buller became nationally known in TCPA litigation circles after filing suit against Bernie 2020 Inc. alongside Cody Olson.

Case Overview

Field Details
Court U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Case No. 0:20-cv-01368
Filing Date June 15, 2020
Plaintiffs Jacob Buller & Cody Olson
Defendant Bernie 2020 Inc.
Judge Eric C. Tostrud

The Allegations

The lawsuit alleged that Bernie 2020 used an ATDS to send unsolicited political text messages without prior express consent.

Plaintiff Date Sender Number Alleged Message
Jacob Buller Oct. 17, 2019 (434) 321-4173 “Hi Jacob, it’s Praveen with Bernie 2020…”
Cody Olson Oct. 18, 2019 (205) 512-2686 “Hi Cody, it’s Brittany with Bernie 2020…”

Key Claims in the Complaint

Allegation Details
No consent Plaintiffs denied giving permission
ATDS usage Alleged use of automated technology
Generic scripting Near-identical messaging
Spoofed numbers Numbers allegedly inactive/disconnected
P2P texting Plaintiffs argued the platform still functioned as an ATDS

The Harm Alleged

The complaint alleged several forms of harm:

Harm Description
Invasion of privacy Unwanted intrusion onto cellular devices
Nuisance Unsolicited political texts
Data consumption Reduction of mobile data
Battery drain Additional device power usage
Processing slowdown Temporary reduction in device performance

Strategic Venue Selection

The case was filed in Minnesota shortly after favorable rulings involving political texting litigation.

Plaintiffs relied heavily on precedent from:

  • Marks v. Crunch San Diego
  • Pederson v. Donald J. Trump For President, Inc.
  • Duran v. La Boom Disco

These decisions supported broader interpretations of what qualifies as an ATDS.

Key Legal Contributions From Buller’s Litigation

1. Political Campaigns Are Not Exempt

The complaint cited FCC guidance establishing that political text messages are still subject to TCPA restrictions when automated technology is used.

2. P2P Platforms May Trigger TCPA Liability

Buller argued that volunteer-operated systems can still qualify as regulated automated platforms when users simply launch pre-written scripts.

This theory later became central to broader litigation over political peer-to-peer texting.

3. Recycled Numbers Liability (2025 Development)

Buller’s litigation also focused on reassigned-number liability.

The theory:

  • A campaign may still face liability if a number changes ownership
  • Prior consent from the previous owner may no longer apply

This helped drive adoption of Reassigned Numbers Database (RND) scrubbing among political consultants.

4. Soundboard Technology = Prerecorded Voice

In later litigation involving Grassroots Targeting, Buller argued that prerecorded audio snippets triggered TCPA prerecorded-voice rules even when activated by a human operator.

5. “Staccato” Texting Patterns

By 2026, Buller’s complaints increasingly emphasized rapid message cadence as evidence of automation.

The Criminal Arrest (November 2025)

On November 21, 2025, Jacob Buller was arrested in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.

Incident Details

Field Details
Date November 21, 2025
Location Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Time Approximately 8:00 a.m.
Initial Report Driver asleep at the wheel
Vehicle Condition Running and allegedly in drive

Police reportedly stated Buller:

  • Was asleep in the vehicle
  • Was holding a cellphone
  • Was not wearing a seatbelt

Charges

Charge Type
Operation While Impaired Criminal
Dangerous Operation Criminal
Possession of Schedule I Substance (Fentanyl) Criminal
Handheld Device Violation Provincial
Seatbelt Violation Provincial
No Licence Offense Provincial

Evidence Allegedly Recovered

Item Details
Suspected fentanyl Approximately two grams
Drug paraphernalia Reportedly present

Drug Evaluation

Test Result
Alcohol Test No alcohol detected
DRE Evaluation Alleged drug impairment

Impact on Buller’s TCPA Litigation

Defense firms increasingly cite Buller’s criminal charges when challenging his adequacy as a proposed class representative.

Common defense arguments include:

Question Raised Litigation Implication
Credibility concerns Impacts class representation
Character issues Challenges adequacy
Public perception Weakens representative status

The criminal allegations have shifted litigation focus away from campaign compliance and toward Buller’s personal conduct.

Professional Background: UX Design

Outside litigation, Buller worked professionally as a UX strategist and designer.

Field Details
Job Title Lead UX Designer
Employers Fjord, Chapter SF
Clients Facebook, Google, UberEats
Expertise User systems and automated platforms

This technical background is frequently referenced in commentary discussing his ability to identify alleged flaws in marketing systems.

How Buller Compares to Other Serial Litigators

Comparison Jacob Buller Cody Olson Stewart Abramson Stanley Hastings
Main Focus Political texting Political texting Energy/Solar Lead generation
Venue Minnesota Minnesota Pennsylvania Arkansas
Criminal Issues Yes (2025 arrest) None known None None
Adequacy Challenges Yes No No Yes
Technical Focus Strong Moderate Moderate Low

What makes Buller unique is the intersection of:

  • Technical platform knowledge
  • Political campaign litigation
  • Criminal allegations impacting class adequacy

What the Buller Litigation Means for Political Campaigns

Lesson Compliance Impact
Political campaigns are not exempt Campaigns remain subject to TCPA
P2P systems are risky Human clicking may not eliminate liability
Recycled numbers matter RND scrubbing is essential
Soundboard systems count Prerecorded snippets may trigger TCPA
Consent remains critical Campaigns must maintain proof

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Jacob Buller a serial litigator?

Yes. Public court filings and legal commentary identify Buller as an active TCPA plaintiff involved in political messaging litigation.

What is Jacob Buller known for?

He is best known for suing Bernie 2020 Inc. over unsolicited automated political texts.

Was Jacob Buller arrested?

Yes. In November 2025, Buller was arrested in Ontario and charged with impaired operation, dangerous operation, and fentanyl possession-related offenses.

How do the criminal charges affect litigation?

Defense firms use the charges to challenge his adequacy and credibility as a class representative.

What is the recycled-number issue?

It involves liability when text messages are sent to a phone number that changed ownership after prior consent was given.

What is soundboard technology?

Technology using prerecorded audio clips activated by human operators.

What is “staccato” texting?

Rapid-fire messaging patterns allegedly used as evidence of automated systems.

Final Thoughts: The Serial Litigator Facing Credibility Challenges

Jacob Buller is not an occasional TCPA plaintiff. He is a documented serial litigator whose litigation helped shape legal debates surrounding political texting, peer-to-peer messaging, reassigned numbers, and automated campaign communications.

His lawsuit against Bernie 2020 contributed to broader scrutiny of political mass-texting systems and helped establish that campaigns cannot automatically avoid TCPA exposure merely by labeling systems “volunteer-driven.”

However, Buller’s November 2025 arrest fundamentally changed the conversation surrounding his litigation profile.

Before 2025 Arrest After 2025 Arrest
Technical TCPA plaintiff Criminal defendant
Credible class representative Adequacy challenged
Focus on campaign compliance Focus on criminal allegations

The serial litigator who challenged presidential campaign texting practices now faces serious questions about whether he can continue serving as an effective class representative in consumer litigation.

Sources & References

Primary Sources – Litigation

  • https://www.classaction.org/media/buller-et-al-v-bernie-2020-inc.pdf
  • https://www.law360.com/articles/1283117/sanders-presidential-campaign-hit-with-suit-over-auto-texts
  • Buller v. Bernie 2020 Inc., Case No. 0:20-cv-01368 (D. Minn.)

Primary Sources – Criminal Charges

  • Sault Ste. Marie Police Service release (Nov. 21, 2025)
  • https://www.instagram.com/p/DSjyjSiDuac/

Secondary Sources

  • https://www.linkedin.com/in/jacob-buller/
  • Pederson v. Donald J. Trump For President, Inc., No. 19-2732 (D. Minn.)
  • Buller v. Grassroots Targeting (2025)

Disclaimer

This article presents information derived from publicly available court filings, legal commentary, judicial rulings, media reporting, and official police records. The characterization of Jacob Buller as a “serial litigator” and “professional plaintiff” is based on documented litigation activity and publicly reported legal proceedings. Criminal charges referenced herein are allegations and remain subject to judicial process unless otherwise resolved in court. This article is provided solely for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

Leave a comment