Skip to content Skip to footer

Manuel Guadian: Serial TCPA Litigator | Professional Plaintiff & Vicarious Liability Target

 

Manuel Guadian (also known as Manuel Guadin, Gabriel Guadian, and operating under aliases including Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa) is a documented serial litigator and professional plaintiff operating out of El Paso, Texas. Based at 7277 Alameda Avenue in El Paso, Guadian has filed multiple TCPA lawsuits in the Western District of Texas targeting the insurance and debt relief industries with claims involving illegal telemarketing calls, robocalls, and National Do Not Call Registry violations.

Guadian is not presented in court records as an ordinary consumer advocate. His litigation history reflects a repeat-filer strategy focused on extracting statutory damages through technical TCPA compliance claims, often by staying on the line with telemarketers long enough to identify alleged “backend” companies and then pursuing vicarious liability claims against larger corporations rather than anonymous call centers.

Legal commentary, defense analysis, and federal court decisions have repeatedly discussed Guadian as a repeat TCPA litigant whose cases helped shape modern vicarious liability standards. In 2025, his claims against SBLI were dismissed after the court concluded he failed to connect the defendant to the actual calls at issue, reinforcing the now widely cited “No Link, No Liability” principle. His litigation history has since become part of the defense roadmap used in TCPA litigation nationwide.

Who Is Manuel Guadian? A Documented Serial Filer in El Paso

Manuel Guadian is an El Paso, Texas-based TCPA plaintiff associated with multiple lawsuits filed primarily in the Western District of Texas (El Paso Division). Court records show that his filings frequently involve robocalls, telemarketing calls, National Do Not Call Registry allegations, and vicarious liability claims against insurance and financial services companies.

 

Personal and professional profile (from public records)

Field Details
Full Name Manuel Guadian
Aliases Manuel Guadin, Marie Vasa, Guadian Gabriel, Mitali Vasa
Age 58 (born January 1968)
Current Address 7277 Alameda Ave, El Paso, TX 79915
Primary Phone 915-808-9367 (mobile)
Primary Email manuelguadian0@gmail.com
Occupation Unknown (no employment records found)
Education Unknown (no school records found)

Alias pattern appearing in public records

Alias Notes
Manuel Guadin Litigation-related variation
Gabriel Guadian Alternative variation
Marie Vasa Alias appearing in public records
Mitali Vasa Alias appearing in public records

Public records associated with Guadian contain multiple name variations, including female-sounding aliases such as Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa. These variations appear across publicly accessible databases and litigation-related references.

Documented litigation pattern

Court filings and legal commentary connect Guadian to:

  • Robocall and telemarketing litigation
  • National Do Not Call Registry claims
  • Vicarious liability theories against insurers and financial service providers
  • ATDS-related allegations
  • Debt relief industry targeting
  • Insurance industry targeting
  • Staying on the line with callers to identify “backend” entities
  • Default judgment and non-response litigation strategies

Address History: Multi-State Residence Pattern

Public records identify a lengthy address history tied primarily to Texas, but also spanning several additional states.

Address Location Last Seen
7277 Alameda Ave El Paso, TX 79915 03/16/2026
11092 Old Ridge Rd Doswell, VA 23047 03/03/2026
1029 S 26th St Saginaw, MI 48601 02/24/2026
2201 W William Cannon Dr Apt 125 Austin, TX 78745 04/18/2024
9555 N Loop Dr El Paso, TX 79907 03/14/2024
10504 Plains Trl Apt B Austin, TX 78758 01/01/2024
1511 Faro Dr Apt 162 Austin, TX 78741 06/06/2023
3805 Tierra Fiji Ln El Paso, TX 79938 12/13/2022
748 Hilton Ave El Paso, TX 79907 12/14/2021
476 E Scott Ave #B Salt Lake City, UT 84115 05/04/2021
9436 Stahala Dr El Paso, TX 79924 10/28/2017
205 Maple St Trlr 18 Clovis, NM 88101 04/25/2015
8254 McElroy Ave El Paso, TX 79907 12/31/2014
317 E Lucero Ave Las Cruces, NM 88001 11/01/2013
1000 Lowry St Apt 1G Delray Beach, FL 33483 N/A

The address history shows residence links to Texas, Virginia, Michigan, Utah, New Mexico, and Florida, while the Western District of Texas remained the primary litigation venue.

The Signature Strategy: Staying on the Line to Identify Deep-Pocketed Defendants

One of the recurring themes in Guadian’s litigation pattern is the effort to identify the company allegedly behind a telemarketing campaign rather than simply the caller who placed the call.

Reported litigation approach

Step Action
1 Receives telemarketing call
2 Remains on the line
3 Engages the caller to gather information
4 Attempts to identify backend service provider
5 Pursues claims against larger corporate defendants

Defense commentary has compared this approach to similar investigatory tactics used by other repeat TCPA plaintiffs. Courts increasingly require plaintiffs to establish concrete factual connections between the caller and the corporate defendant before allowing vicarious liability claims to proceed.

Guadian v. SBLI: The “No Link, No Liability” Ruling

The most significant case associated with Guadian is Guadian v. SBLI (Savings Bank Mutual Life Insurance Company of Massachusetts) filed in the Western District of Texas.

Guadian v. SBLI (2023–2025)

Category Details
Court U.S. District Court – Western District of Texas (El Paso Division)
Case Number 3:23-cv-00235
Key Issue Vicarious liability for telemarketing calls
Outcome Dismissed
Litigation Impact Frequently cited in TCPA defense commentary

Guadian’s allegations

According to the complaint:

  • He allegedly received unsolicited calls related to life insurance
  • His number was allegedly listed on the National Do Not Call Registry
  • He claimed the calls violated TCPA restrictions

SBLI’s defense

SBLI argued:

  • It did not place the calls directly
  • Third parties allegedly made the calls
  • Guadian failed to establish that SBLI controlled the callers
  • Mere references to a company name were insufficient to establish liability

Court findings

The dismissal focused on the absence of factual allegations tying SBLI directly to the callers or establishing the necessary control relationship required for vicarious liability.

Legal significance

Before These Rulings After These Rulings
Broad vicarious liability theories often survived motions to dismiss Courts increasingly require specific factual links
Name references could support claims Mere name-dropping is insufficient
Generic allegations were more common Pleading standards are stricter
Companies often settled early Defendants now have stronger dismissal arguments

The phrase commonly associated with the outcome became:

“No Link, No Liability”

The principle emphasized by defense commentators is straightforward: a plaintiff cannot hold a company liable merely because a caller referenced that company during a telemarketing call.

 

Guadian v. Amity One Debt Relief (2025–2026)

In addition to SBLI, Guadian pursued claims against debt relief providers including Amity One Debt Relief.

Case summary

Category Details
Court U.S. District Court – Western District of Texas
Industry Debt relief
Outcome Settled/Dismissed February 2026
Litigation Pattern Included default-related procedural activity

Default judgment strategy observed in filings

Step Action
1 Lawsuit filed
2 Defendant allegedly slow to respond
3 Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default
4 Increased settlement pressure
5 Resolution or dismissal

Defense analysts frequently identify default leverage as a recurring feature in high-volume TCPA litigation involving smaller defendants.

 

Comparison with Other Texas TCPA Filers

Guadian is frequently discussed alongside other active Texas TCPA plaintiffs.

Plaintiff Location Known Litigation Theme
Manuel Guadian El Paso “No Link” precedent
Eric Salaiz Pflugerville Repeat technical TCPA claims
Yazmin Gonzalez Spring / El Paso High-volume filings
Brandon Callier El Paso TCPA damages strategies

Common patterns

  • Western District of Texas filings
  • Insurance and financial-services targeting
  • Vicarious liability allegations
  • Similar pleading structures
  • Reliance on TCPA statutory damages

 

Vehicles Associated with Public Records

Public records identify the following vehicles associated with Guadian:

# Vehicle
1 2009 Chevrolet Suburban
2 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
3 2011 Dodge Charger

 

No Public Property or Employment Records Located

Public records searches referenced in commentary indicate:

Category Result
Owned Properties None found
Employment Records None found
School Records None found

Possible explanations discussed in commentary include renting, informal work arrangements, retirement, or incomplete records.

 

Family and Relative Records

Public records identify multiple possible relatives connected to Guadian.

1st Degree Relatives (Selected Entries)

Name Age Address
Lorraine Bujanda 58 12925 Warren Dr, El Paso, TX 79928
Gabriel Guadian 37 El Paso, TX 79907
Gabriela Medrano 32 748 Hilton Ave, El Paso, TX 79907
Manuel Guadian 37 El Paso, TX 79907
Damian Guadian 35 2201 W William Cannon Dr, Austin, TX 78745
Francisco Guadian 91 748 Hilton Ave, El Paso, TX 79907

 

Summary of Litigation Profile

Feature Details
Primary Court Western District of Texas (El Paso Division)
Common Claims TCPA violations, DNC claims, vicarious liability
Target Industries Insurance, debt relief, financial services
Key Defense Outcome SBLI dismissal
Signature Strategy Identifying backend entities and pursuing larger defendants
Notable Litigation Theme “No Link, No Liability”

 

Why Guadian’s Cases Matter for TCPA Litigation

Guadian’s cases became significant because they reinforced stricter pleading standards for vicarious liability claims under the TCPA.

Litigation trend shift

Earlier Approach Current Trend
Broad allegations often survived Specific factual allegations required
Name association could be enough Actual control relationship required
Cases advanced easily Early dismissals increasingly common
Settlement leverage favored plaintiffs Defense roadmap strengthened

The outcome of Guadian v. SBLI is now frequently referenced by defense counsel arguing that plaintiffs must establish a real factual connection between the defendant and the caller before litigation can proceed.

 

Public Reputation and Legal Commentary

Guadian is frequently described in legal commentary as a repeat TCPA litigant associated with the Western District of Texas.

Evidence Source
Multiple TCPA cases Federal court records
Repeat litigant commentary TCPAWorld analysis
Multiple aliases Public records
SBLI dismissal Federal court ruling
Default-related litigation activity Court docket activity

Defense-side commentary often references Guadian as part of the broader Texas TCPA filing ecosystem involving repeat plaintiffs and aggressive statutory-damages litigation strategies.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Manuel Guadian a serial litigator?

Court records and legal commentary describe Guadian as a repeat TCPA plaintiff associated with multiple lawsuits in the Western District of Texas.

What was the key issue in Guadian v. SBLI?

The central issue was whether Guadian sufficiently connected SBLI to the telemarketing calls through a viable vicarious liability theory.

What does “No Link, No Liability” mean?

The phrase refers to the principle that a plaintiff cannot hold a company liable for telemarketing calls without factual allegations showing the company controlled or authorized the caller.

Does Guadian use aliases?

Public records reference several aliases including Manuel Guadin, Gabriel Guadian, Marie Vasa, and Mitali Vasa.

What industries were targeted in his lawsuits?

His litigation involved insurance companies, debt relief businesses, and financial services providers.

Did Guadian own property?

Public records referenced in commentary reported no owned property records.

 

Final Thoughts

Manuel Guadian’s litigation history reflects the broader evolution of TCPA litigation in federal courts. His cases became closely associated with disputes over vicarious liability, backend corporate responsibility, and the evidentiary burden required to connect telemarketing calls to larger companies.

The dismissal in Guadian v. SBLI became particularly significant because it reinforced a stricter standard requiring plaintiffs to establish concrete factual connections between telemarketers and corporate defendants. Defense attorneys now routinely cite these rulings when challenging broad or unsupported TCPA allegations.

As courts continue scrutinizing serial TCPA litigation and vicarious liability theories, Guadian’s cases remain part of the ongoing legal debate surrounding repeat plaintiffs, statutory damages, and the future of telemarketing litigation.

 

Sources & References

Primary Sources – Manuel Guadian (Litigation)

https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/texas/txwdce/3:2023cv00235/1172744946/29/0.pdf (Guadian v. SBLI)

https://tcpaworld.com/2025/04/23/no-link-no-liability-court-dismisses-vicarious-liability-allegations-against-insurer-in-tcpa-case/

https://natlawreview.com/article/no-link-no-liability-court-dismisses-vicarious-liability-allegations/

Guadian v. SBLI, 3:23-cv-00235 (W.D. Tex.)

Guadian v. Amity One Debt Relief (2025-2026) — settled/dismissed February 2026

Secondary Sources – Legal Commentary

TCPAWorld — Coverage of repeat TCPA litigants in Texas

National Law Review — Vicarious liability analysis

Western District of Texas — El Paso Division dockets

Public Records – BeenVerified Report

Full Name: Manuel Guadian

Aliases: Marie Vasa, Guadian Gabriel, Mitali Vasa

Date of Birth: January 1968 (age 58)

Current Address: 7277 Alameda Ave, El Paso, TX 79915

Primary Phone: 915-808-9367

Primary Email: manuelguadian0@gmail.com

Vehicles: 2009 Chevrolet Suburban, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, 2011 Dodge Charger

Properties: None found

Relatives: 21 identified (1st degree relatives include Lorraine Bujanda, Gabriel Guadian, Gabriela Medrano, et al.)

Address History: 24 addresses across Texas, Virginia, Michigan, Utah, New Mexico, Florida

Disclaimer

This article presents allegations, legal characterizations, and procedural history based on publicly available court filings, legal commentary, media reporting, judicial rulings, and public records from BeenVerified. Public records data may not be fully accurate or complete and should not be used for employment screening, tenant screening, credit decisions, or any purpose requiring FCRA compliance. This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

 

Leave a comment